Timeline for Proposal: Possible alternative to recipe StackExchange sister site....
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 16, 2017 at 15:43 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://meta.cooking.stackexchange.com/ with https://cooking.meta.stackexchange.com/
|
|
Dec 15, 2010 at 19:02 | comment | added | Aaronut Mod | It's too bad you're not using .NET; then you could use DotNetOpenAuth, which I'm pretty sure is what Stack Exchange itself uses. Ah well - no pressure, take it at your own pace! | |
Dec 15, 2010 at 17:12 | comment | added | Daniel Bingham | @Aaronut Been working on OpenID but don't have it implemented yet, and honestly, I'm a little nervous about doing it. I've read some pretty hellish stories about OpenID folks not providing the e-mail and making it very easy to lose your account. Going to keep looking into it though. | |
Oct 26, 2010 at 20:57 | comment | added | Aaronut Mod | @Daniel: I agree in a sense - many people have complained about the OpenID system on SO/SE (although for me it was one click to use my Google identity). The rub here is that since users would be coming from Seasoned Advice in the first place, they'd already be using OpenID, which is why I think it's important for a (relatively) seamless user experience. Of course, I can't make any guarantees of what will happen if you do implement OpenID - just saying it'll probably be a harder sell without it. | |
Oct 26, 2010 at 15:00 | comment | added | Daniel Bingham | @aaronut Yeah, I've thought about that. In my experience, a native registration system is more natural for non-techy users than open ID often. Which is why I went for that first. But, there's no reason I couldn't add an open-id option in addition to it. I'm not sure how much work it would take, but it probably wouldn't take too much. I'm certainly open to trying it. | |
Oct 26, 2010 at 14:15 | comment | added | Aaronut Mod | One suggestion: I obviously have no idea if we could get the team's support on making it an official sister site (as you know, I do support the idea), but one thing that would almost certainly be a prerequisite would be for you to support OpenID, since that's what members here will already be using. Even the simplest registration process would be disruptive to the flow. | |
Oct 26, 2010 at 11:46 | history | edited | Daniel Bingham | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 431 characters in body
|
Oct 21, 2010 at 4:22 | comment | added | Daniel Bingham | @Martha Sorry, I'll fix that :) Working on beta version two with lots of new features. It'll be in with that. | |
Oct 21, 2010 at 0:37 | comment | added | Marti | Ack! Radio buttons should come BEFORE their labels! Took me a while to figure out how to search ingredients instead of titles. | |
Aug 16, 2010 at 13:40 | history | edited | Daniel Bingham | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 412 characters in body
|
Aug 9, 2010 at 4:02 | answer | added | Ocaasi | timeline score: 3 | |
Aug 9, 2010 at 1:59 | history | edited | Daniel Bingham | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited body
|
Aug 8, 2010 at 19:06 | comment | added | hobodave | Damn! Those pictures have made me ravenous. | |
Aug 8, 2010 at 19:04 | history | edited | hobodave | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 37 characters in body
|
Aug 8, 2010 at 18:11 | history | asked | Daniel Bingham | CC BY-SA 2.5 |