I was wondering if questions about a restaurant's kitchen management are on-topic or not. example: how can I prepare this faster ? can you suggest a better menu to reduce waste ? How can I communicate better with my helper chef so that we don't step into each other during preparation ?
Much of what we're trying to do with the scope of the site is select a particular demographic - that being food professionals (and other experts). These questions, by definition, are targeted toward that exact audience and, if anything, require more expertise to answer than our other topics, not less.
I'm reprinting this little tidbit from Joel (one of the founders):
Ask real, expert questions.
We want you to capture the moment that plumbers feel when they look at PlumberOverflow and say, "Whoa! That's my kinda site!" On a site about plumbing, there are 200 easy plumbing questions, and they've all been asked 100 times on other sites. Don't suggest questions like "How do I unclog a drain." Instead ask, "If you run 2.5 GPM through 50 feet of 1/2" galv pipe, how many psi will be lost to friction loss?" Remember, the pro sites WILL attract the enthusiasts, but not the other way around!
Do the trials and tribulations of a busy restaurant kitchen fit the bill of an expert cooking question? Damn skippy they do.
It may not be an officially sanctioned topic, but as long as it doesn't take the form of fuzzy career advice, I'd say absolutely, go for it!
Restaurant questions seem useful in and of themselves and as a way to attract experts.
I question, however, why these issues are more out of scope than those relating to foraging or growing ingredients. In a sense, both deal with secondary issues. Restaurant management is secondary to cooking. Foraging and growing ingredients is secondary to food. Restaurant management attracts experts from the food-preparation side. Foraging and growing ingredients attracts experts from the food-cultivation side. I think they are both useful. Why the bias for one and not the other?